Provider-level data on care decisions is complicated by attribution, muddied by patient variation, slow to gather, and easy to argue with. Veradence gives you a rapid, clean view of current practice patterns, then introduces an intervention to help providers improve the quality and value of their decisions: personal feedback and peer discussion for health systems, a novel test or technology for life science companies.
Proven care can take years, even decades, to become routine practice. We move evidence into practice sooner.
Who we work with
Engage your physicians and APPs with our patient simulations, aligned with your clinical and ROI priorities. Your clinicians see how their care stacks up against their colleagues', get personal feedback against evidence-based guidelines, and earn CME/MOC credit. You get detailed insight into current practice patterns and track how care and value improve with serial feedback.
Rapidly map the care decision pathways of practicing physicians across the country, in weeks, not years, using our validated patient simulation approach. Introduce your test, technology or intervention and quantify how diagnostic and treatment decisions change. Depending on your needs, a project can run as a randomized, IRB-approved trial built for peer-reviewed publication, or as a leaner practice assessment to guide internal strategy.
How we generate clean, attributable data
Clinicians work through realistic simulated patients and we record the decisions they make: what they order, how they document, which treatments they choose, and when they refer. Because the patients are held constant, the differences we measure are directly attributable to each provider, not to patient variation. It gives us a clean and transparent view of current care gaps and practice change over time.
1. Measure care decisions today
2. Serial personal and group feedback
3. Practice improvement and ROI
1. Measure care decisions today
2. Introduce the new product
3. Identify the impact
Peer-reviewed evidence of impact
Founder
Trever founded Veradence Health after more than fifteen years working on one problem: the gap between what the evidence says and what happens in the exam room. He is first or senior author on ten of his 19 peer-reviewed publications and has been principal investigator on multiple IRB-approved clinical utility studies.